"Ultimate" P-64?

wolf · Post by **wolf** » April 10th, 2009, 9:43 am

O.K. new friends..

I am new to the board and this is my first post, I stumbled upon an ad for a P-64 at J&G, WOW I said..seeing as I am Polish and have a Polish AK..I MUST have a P-64!

I have read a great many posts here but still..I would like some opinions.

What do YOU consider to be the "ULTIMATE" P-64 and why? Triangle hammer vs. round "A" marked, year etc.

(Side notes..should I get 2 do to a lack of parts? How many extra mags do you suggest I purchase?)

Thank you ahead of time!

manicmechanic · Post by **manicmechanic** » April 10th, 2009, 11:36 am

Welcome wolf!! I have the P64 in both versions and the round hammer is a little easier to conceal carry, but the triangle is much easier to cock to use in S/A. I've also got the Tantal so I'm sure we'll be in some good discussions about those too. As for mags a few extra are always good to have. As far as extra parts gun if you can afford it it wouldn't be a bad idea.
Again welcome!!

wolf · Post by **wolf** » April 10th, 2009, 3:07 pm

Thank you! Great advice!

(Side note..I shoulda bought a Tantal while I had the chance! I have an underfolder in 7.62 x 39 now)

ipsd · Post by **ipsd** » April 10th, 2009, 9:18 pm

I consider My p-64 cause its small compact and its still a 9mm. When I show it to anyone there like that can't be a 9mm its way to small. Easy to use plenty reg 9mm brass laying around for converting. Its Eastern Bloc means it almost lifetime guarantied to work every time you pull the trigger. I wouldn't know about the round hammer A marked models mine is a 1974 triangle hammer and I have the A on the frame too. I too own an AK not a polish one but a Sagia 16" Here is a pic of two of my toys right here.

Post by **papabear** » April 11th, 2009, 8:01 am

wolf,

Welcome aboard, glad to have you with us..... ;D, as for round or triangular I got both,as did a lot of us here, they serve different purposes for me.

Papabear

istbankodad · Post by **istbankodad** » April 11th, 2009, 9:35 am

Check out centerfire. They have a better deal on p-64 then j&g
http://www.centerfiresystems.com/

wolf · Post by **wolf** » April 11th, 2009, 3:41 pm

ipsd wrote:I consider My p-64 cause its small compact and its still a 9mm. When I show it to anyone there like that can't be a 9mm its way to small. Easy to use plenty reg 9mm brass laying around for converting. Its Eastern Bloc means it almost lifetime guarantied to work every time you pull the trigger. I wouldn't know about the round hammer A marked models mine is a 1974 triangle hammer and I have the A on the frame too. I too own an AK not a polish one but a Sagia 16" Here is a pic of two of my toys right here.

Nice Saiga! I have one of those too..AWESOME weapon! ;D

wolf · Post by **wolf** » April 11th, 2009, 3:46 pm

papabear wrote:wolf,

Welcome aboard, glad to have you with us..... ;D, as for round or triangular I got both,as did a lot of us here, they serve different purposes for me.

Papabear

Good advice! Thanks!

wolf · Post by **wolf** » April 11th, 2009, 3:47 pm

istbankodad wrote:Check out centerfire. They have a better deal on p-64 then j&g
http://www.centerfiresystems.com/

Thanks for the heads up!

frankmako · Post by **frankmako** » April 11th, 2009, 10:29 pm

i like the round hammer, but either will do the job

wolf · Post by **wolf** » April 12th, 2009, 11:30 am

Are all parts exchangable between the round and triangular hammered models?

The Unofficial P64 Resource Forum