I opened a box of wolf 100grain at a store today and noticed that they have redesigned their bullet into a kinda round nose conehead hybrid that actually feeds through my cz82, what I take from this is that the wolf company is taking advice from their customers, so we may eventually be able to get wolf ammo that has weeded out the problems if letters are sent to the company to let them know what problems are being encountered.
hey it was just an observation. now I don't advocate using the ammo because I have heard of problems encountered but I personally have had 0 problems for years in 7.62x39 .30 carbine and 9x18 (9x18 in months not years) If it wasn't the only ammo available for a reasonable price in my area I probably wouldn't give it a second look, and now that all gunshows in my area have jacked up the 9x18 prices to very unreasonable amounts, aside from buying online (which I do) it leaves the lowly 9x18 shooter in my area with few options. I have suggested to the dealers that going with other makers may be a wise idea it hasn't changed anything. so in our area we have to make due or for the web savvy, buy online
Trent: You may have found some Wolf that i haven't seen. The most recent of their stuff that I know about is the 95-grain Military Classic. Before that they made 100 and 109-grain coneheads. Way before that, they had a round-nose 100-grain 9x18 on a box marked "bi-metal".
To clarify what you found, could you describe the box, the headstamp, and maybe can you even take a picture?
yea, once I find the camera, It may be tonight or tomorrow morning before I can get it, This as I understand it is a new shipment to my dealer , it also seems to have a different primer sealer, it's colored a dark purple instead of the red that is normally on wolfs (wolves?)
My neighbor gave me these the other day and they all shot fine . I didn't save any bullets or cases from them tho. The bullet is shaped more like a 9mm luger bullet, kind of like a football at the ogive,but a noticeable "edge" at the case mouth.
Accuracy was , well, ...wolf-ish. I measured the OAL of each bullet and the tolerances were suprisingly tight ! I had three groups of measured bullets : OAL= 24.7/24.8/24.9 with the majority being 30 cartridges measuring 24.8mm ,10 measured at 24.7,and 10 at 24.9mm.
They all fed fine and i noticed that the 24.9mm bullets shot the tightest "group" if you call 8"@25yds "tight". Overall impression- they were free and worth every penny. If that is too ambiguous, I thought they were okay but I reload so they were "just something to try". If I could find them at $5.95 a box I might pick up a couple hundred for blasting stuff with so I could save my reloads for more "important" shooting. G
ok, I wanted to keep the picture big so I'm linking you guys to it, there are 3 rounds (From the left) Original 100g wolf cone head, new wolf semi cone head, and a Chinese round for comparison)
didn't mean to get your hopes up, but it does feed alot smoother than it did before the redesign, In looking at the "cone heads" They seem like they would penetrate better than standard round nosed bullets, have you found this to be accurate?
That I haven't tested. Never looked much at 9x18 FMJ penetration testing - I don't think there is any make I know of that won't penetrate beyond what you'd want.