Page 2 of 2
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: September 6th, 2011, 10:29 am
by lklawson
stover wrote:In the US, we expect LE to shoot. Not the same in Europe, especially during the cold war.
I was in the UK 2 years years ago and most Patrol Officers are still unarmed. They wear stab vest and carry night sticks.
Britain isn't Poland.
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: September 6th, 2011, 1:32 pm
by stover
Yep, but I've never lived or worked in Poland. I have in the UK and Germany.
The lawman with a white hat and six guns blazing is a uniquely American thing. I think we as a culture place more value on a pistol that others do. I assume that is why foreign countries have issued P64's, Makarovs, PPKs, Nagants, Nambus and numerous other designs an American would think is ill suited to the tasks of a service pistol.
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: September 6th, 2011, 3:13 pm
by Byrd
That is an astute observation! I have a friend who is a police officer & the weapons he is armed with would repel a small army.
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: September 13th, 2011, 10:46 pm
by Diesel McBadass
The tokarev was flawed (a sao without condition 1 ability) but the p64 was not a good replacement as a service pistol. Its a concealed carry gun not a military arm. Add in the original 71 grain polish round was akin to a .32 auto in power, unlike modern mak ammo thats better than .380.
That said im glad the poles made it and cant wait till it arrives at my ffl!
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: September 17th, 2011, 12:28 am
by GeneCC
An officer's pistol was intended to shoot deserting or unruly soldiers. So it had to be close quarter.
A smart officer carries a common rifle so that they do not stand out to a sniper.
I've read that European police practice is to shoot offenders in the legs. Most Europeans do not carry a concealed firearm so Police will not have to incapacitate someone who may shoot back at them. A 32 ACP or 380 ACP does a fine job.
Most American police officers tend to shoot to incapacitate or kill so they carry a much more potent firearm than a 380 ACP. Probably because many American violent criminals, who would shoot a police officer, can be expected to have a concealed firearm.
Gene
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: September 28th, 2011, 9:42 pm
by Foo Bird
I don't go by cost, but demonstrated reputation. My Makarov that I bought in 1994 was known to be super reliable and accurate. I paid $150 for it new. Still have it.
I researched the P-64 a bunch before I bought it, and like the Makarov before it, it is my CCW gun.
A reliable and accurate gun doesn't have to cost $600-$1500.
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: October 2nd, 2011, 2:11 pm
by Legally Armed
Foo Bird wrote:I don't go by cost, but demonstrated reputation. My Makarov that I bought in 1994 was known to be super reliable and accurate. I paid $150 for it new. Still have it.
I researched the P-64 a bunch before I bought it, and like the Makarov before it, it is my CCW gun.
A reliable and accurate gun doesn't have to cost $600-$1500.
true, but the extremely low prices of the 9x18 pistols are basically subsidized by governments that no longer exist. i think a new production makarov made in the US would probably cost $400-$500.
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: October 2nd, 2011, 8:10 pm
by stover
true, but the extremely low prices of the 9x18 pistols are basically subsidized by governments that no longer exist. i think a new production makarov made in the US would probably cost $400-$500.
If they made em, I'd buy one or two also.
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: October 18th, 2011, 8:45 pm
by Legally Armed
stover wrote:
true, but the extremely low prices of the 9x18 pistols are basically subsidized by governments that no longer exist. i think a new production makarov made in the US would probably cost $400-$500.
If they made em, I'd buy one or two also.
why, when you can get like new bulgarians for $230, and like new east germans for a little over $300? we'd be lucky if new production maks in the US were even as good as the bulgies, let alone the east germans.
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: October 18th, 2011, 9:18 pm
by stover
I dream of a Polymer framed, double stack Mak with a life time warrantee.
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: October 19th, 2011, 8:57 am
by lklawson
stover wrote:I dream of a Polymer framed, double stack Mak with a life time warrantee.
I recall someone trying to wildcat a 9x18 Mak into a Kel Tec P11 frame.
Should be doable. Just need a new bbl, different recoil spring, and maybe tweaks to the mag. I know for a fact one gent was shooting .380ACP out of a P11 that he reduced the recoil spring on (he was just letting it headspace on the extractor and he knew the risks).
I also saw some folks wanting to do the same thing to the P3AT, but I think that the 9x18 Mak round is too much for that platform.
Peace favor your sword,
Kirk
Re: What were they thinking?
Posted: October 19th, 2011, 11:34 am
by stover
Looked at those options before too. P3AT barrel walls are so thin shooting .380 scares me a bit. P-11 might be a good option to convert but I never took any action to do so. I was hoping to get a 9x18 Kevin barrel and a Baby Desert Eagle, but Magnum Research tells me they have modified the pistol enough that it wouldn't work.
So, I've decided to wait. With more companies producing domestic 9x18mm ammo, I hope someone will eventually give it a go. If not, I sure like shooting my D.D.R. not a bad pistol to be "stuck" with

.